The Divorce Bill Debate: Exploring the Origins and Implications of ‘Till Death Do Us Part’ Marcoleta, Lagman debate

Divorce Bill Debate: Lagman, Marcoleta Spar On Origin Of ‘Till Death Do Us Part’

Divorce has always been a contentious issue in many societies. It is a topic that elicits strong emotions and sparks heated debates. In the Philippines, where divorce is not legal, the discussion surrounding the proposed Divorce Bill has once again taken center stage.

The recent debate between Representatives Edcel Lagman and Rodante Marcoleta shed light on the origins of the phrase ’till death do us part’, which is often associated with marriage and the commitment it entails.

The Historical Context

During the debate, Lagman argued that the phrase ’till death do us part’ has its roots in the Anglican Book of Common Prayer, which was first published in 1549. He emphasized that the phrase is not exclusive to Catholicism, as Marcoleta suggested, but rather has a broader historical and religious significance.

Lagman further explained that the phrase signifies the lifelong commitment that couples make to each other when they enter into marriage. It is a solemn vow that transcends any legal or religious institution.

Religious Perspectives

Marcoleta, on the other hand, took a more religious stance, asserting that the phrase ’till death do us part’ is deeply rooted in Catholicism. He argued that the Catholic Church considers marriage a sacrament that is indissoluble, and therefore divorce goes against its teachings.

While Marcoleta’s argument holds weight within the context of Catholicism, Lagman highlighted the need to consider the diverse religious beliefs and practices of the Filipino population. He emphasized that the proposed Divorce Bill aims to provide an option for couples whose marriages have irretrievably broken down, regardless of their religious affiliations.

The Social Implications

Beyond the religious and historical aspects, the debate also touched upon the social implications of legalizing divorce in the Philippines. Lagman argued that the absence of divorce laws puts women in abusive or unhappy marriages at a disadvantage, as they are unable to seek legal dissolution of their unions.

He further pointed out that divorce laws exist in many countries around the world, including predominantly Catholic nations such as Spain, Italy, and Ireland. Legalizing divorce in the Philippines, according to Lagman, would align the country with global standards and provide a much-needed avenue for individuals trapped in toxic relationships.

Marcoleta, however, expressed concerns about the potential breakdown of the family unit and the impact it could have on children. He argued that divorce could lead to an increase in single-parent households and negatively affect the upbringing of children.

The Way Forward

As the debate between Lagman and Marcoleta demonstrated, the issue of divorce is a complex one with multiple dimensions. It involves not only legal and religious considerations but also societal and cultural factors.

While the debate continues, it is crucial for policymakers to carefully weigh the arguments presented and consider the best interests of the Filipino people. The proposed Divorce Bill provides an opportunity to address the needs of individuals in unhappy or abusive marriages, while also taking into account the importance of preserving the family unit.

Ultimately, the decision on whether to legalize divorce in the Philippines rests with the lawmakers and the Filipino people. It is a decision that will shape the future of marriage and family dynamics in the country, and one that should be made with careful deliberation and a deep understanding of the diverse perspectives at play.

Share on Facebook

Tweet

Follow us